|
|
|
|
|
|
#810 - 08/03/03 07:05 PM
Re: Triton vs. XP 80 vs. Motif ?
|
Member
Registered: 12/23/02
Posts: 31
|
I own an XP-80 and have messed around on the Triton and the Motif before. In my opinion, the XP-80 is far and away the best of the three - I seriously considered the Triton and Motif before buying the XP-80, and this was only a few months ago (when the XP-80 was already out of production!). It's got a wonderful interface, including a graphical display conspicuously lacking in eye candy and rather good at being functional. Most keyboards these days try too hard to have a computer screen, which, for a keyboard, is just a pain in the butt. The XP-80 also has a great (not perfect, but great) sequencer, a great selection of expansion cards available, and (drum roll here) it looks way better than the other two. The Triton and Motif have annoying control panels (bad design, bad layout, vexing buttons), which was one of the major things that turned me off of them. I'll admit, however, that all three have, more or less, good sounds.
I would get the XP-80 any day - even over the Fantom.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#815 - 08/04/03 07:48 PM
Re: Triton vs. XP 80 vs. Motif ?
|
Member
Registered: 07/13/03
Posts: 321
|
I Knew about Karma long time but it never interested me much, I just looked in my musician`s friend catalog, the price is better than Triton`s, I would of get Triton Le if it would have floppy drive and some audio inputs to record from guitar. Not the triton studio, because price is a little high, higher then triton classic, but triton studio is not that much better then triton classic.Karma doesn`t interest me that much, if it would look like triton I`d be much more interested in it, but apearence is not that important, I was also thinking about Synths like Roland XP-10 Yamaha S03, (XV-88 interested me but The price is a little too high,[itprobably costs alot because it has 88 keys]) To save money I will buy a 61 key synth(if possible),and it is more compact.Why I want a Good synth, is because I want a synth to have it for about 5-8 years to last ,and for church or wedding music(song accompaniment)[like arrenger keyboard`s Ballad,8 beat,16 Beat, Pop styles,Light 6/8 slow rock,walts that kind of music].In other words: almodt any music but not LATIN, JAZZ, ROCK etc..
[This message has been edited by Vadim (edited 08-04-2003).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#817 - 08/05/03 12:53 PM
Re: Triton vs. XP 80 vs. Motif ?
|
Member
Registered: 07/13/03
Posts: 321
|
I played on RS-5 at the store once, if we`ll compare Triton`s arpegiator to RS-5, I like Triton`s better, RS`s triggers only one tone guitar, organ etc... those kind of arpegios I can play my self (if I try hard), but Triton`s arpegiator plays multiple tones, like guitar strum, pad, strings, drums,all at once. About XV-88, I`ll admit, that I never played on it, just saw it in a magazine,and I heard that that XV tones are the "best",(I wished that Roland would make a XV-88 with 61 keys).I`m also interested now about Fantom-s, isit like Fantom?. Now I`m "strugling" between these synths: KORG TRITON, KORG KARMA, ROLAND XV-88, ROLAND FANTOM, ROLAND FANTOM-S, ROLAND XP-80, YAMAHA MOTIF.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#820 - 08/05/03 09:42 PM
Re: Triton vs. XP 80 vs. Motif ?
|
Member
Registered: 03/20/01
Posts: 847
Loc: Nashvville TN
|
I, like llyren, own an XP-80, and though I agree with his assessment of the keyboard, I don't think it will suit you. The XP arpeggiator is only single as well, meaning only one instrument at a time, not a whole band being run on multi-arpeggiators. The XP is more of a create-it-yourself kind of board. As close as it could come to your style of arpeggiator is in patterns. You can trigger paterns with keys. A patern is basically a short sequence that gets looped. So, you could put a drum loop on one patern, a bass line on one, a string line, etc, then trigger these paterns using separate keys on the XP. However, you still have to create the patterns, and they won't change chords, unless you create a pattern for each chord you want.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#824 - 08/09/03 03:33 PM
Re: Triton vs. XP 80 vs. Motif ?
|
Senior Member
Registered: 11/17/99
Posts: 1150
Loc: netherlands
|
mm.. reading thru the suggestions and comments you give, I do not understand why you want a synthesizer? If I understand well what you are saying, you are looking for; Styles which are dedicated to your own compositions?
Why not just use your arranger board and make your own styles?
or;
You could save yourselve a lot of money by going the software route!
Have a look at band in a box software or jammer pro software. Or you could just use your va76 to record each track in sequencer software.
_________________________
Keyboards/Sound Units: Kurzweil 2600S, Roland VR-760, Acces Virus C, Roland G-800, Akai AX60, Minimoog, Machine Drum, Roland R8-M, mediastation x-76
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#826 - 08/10/03 01:00 PM
Re: Triton vs. XP 80 vs. Motif ?
|
Member
Registered: 07/13/03
Posts: 321
|
I knew someone will ask a question about why i need a synth, because i have VA 76...Before I got VA 76, I was thinking about buying Synth or Arranger(va 76 or Triton)I was close to buying Triton,before my VA 76 I had Casio WK-1250($300)on my casio was 6-Track sequencer, mostly i was using styles on my casio, but then grudualy i moved into making songs without styles, recording all tracks manualy, but using 6-track sequencer...and that casio wasn`t working properly, I think it was melfanctioning because i took it apart trying to get out a penny which had fallen in between the keys. But why I still want a synth...well, when i play on triton in a store then play on my va 76 at nome I feel a little sorry for not buying a synth, but then I think: if i get a synth and get rid out of a VA 76, no i`m not gonna get rid of my VA 76, maybe I`ll buy a synth and then after some time passes I`ll sell it.Another reason I wan`t a synth is: when i look in some magazine or anything about professional or wellknown keyboard musicians, all of them use synths instead of arrangers(maybe because, if they would use styles someone would be able to play the same music).And synths are cheaper then arrangers,but why if pros use synths.And another thing about VA 76:I think VA 76/VA 7 has the best sequencer of all keys, including synths,VA`s sequencer has those editing stuff, you can change velocity of every note which is very usefull with drum track, Roland engeniers did outstanding job on sequencer`s editing!Another reason I want a synth is that synths have much more powerfull tones.But VA76`s sequencer holds me tords the va76, that`s why i asked a question before about Synth`s sequencer.I have much more to tell but i hate typing(hate writing even more),and before i type in one idea i forget what i was thinking to type next.
[This message has been edited by Vadim (edited 08-10-2003).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|