Thanks for your post Scott.

Can you tell me what audible difference can be heard between using a 96K sampling rate and a 192K sampling rate? I realize that CD quality is generally 48K, and that the ear can not hear any greater than 20K.

So then, the obvious answer would be that there is no recognizable difference between sampling at 96K vs 192K... which leads me to ask, if there is no perceptible difference, then why do they even make the 192K sampling rate? There must be some advantages to 192K sampling rate.

Confused... Russ